SUPPORTED BY The ChangeOrg
Judgement 5 of 7 How sure we are: Observed

Africa's largest emergencies were almost absent from the speeches

Both emergencies needed a government to champion them in New York and bring others to pay. For Ebola, that role fell to the United States. For El Niño, nobody took it. Africa's own leaders spoke about other things, although both crises fall on African people first.

The reasoning

By 23 September, had counted 7,890 confirmed cases of and 3,799 deaths in seven provinces of the DRC. Almost half of those infected have died. WHO declared it a global health emergency, its highest level of alarm, on 17 May. No vaccine is approved for this type of Ebola. A trial of a vaccine made for a different type began in Ituri province on 21 September, with 20,000 doses for front-line workers. The DRC's own speech to the Assembly dwelt on Rwanda and on minerals. The money to fight the outbreak came from a meeting in the margins called by the United States.

The (WMO) puts the chance that El Niño lasts until February 2027 at close to 100%. The UN's regional alert gives a 70% chance that rain in southern Africa from October to December will be lower than in any El Niño year since 1950. The UN has a plan with 84 actions to reach 11.9 million people before the worst arrives. It costs $111.3 million and is about 80% unfunded. Only 13 of the 84 actions have money set aside in advance. The region does have grain in store. South Africa expects a record maize harvest of about 17 million tonnes, and Zambia has about 2.5 million tonnes available to export. Each month without money leaves less time to protect harvests and water supplies.

Both emergencies are cheaper to deal with now than later. Neither needed a speech from the podium to be funded. Each needed a sponsor, and in New York Africa's own leaders did not act as that sponsor for either crisis.

The evidence

The strongest argument against

Speeches are a poor measure of how a crisis is handled. The Ebola response rests on the coalition's money, WHO's work in the field and vaccine trials in the region. African leaders may also have pressed for both crises in private meetings away from the podium.

Sector briefings behind this judgement

Recommended moves

Curious Briefs · Take part

Join the conversation

Your email address is never shown to anyone, and we add you to the newsletter only if you tick the box.

Curious Briefs · Your account

Your account

Your information

Download everything we hold about you

Delete my account

This deletes your account, your comments, reactions and highlights at once. It cannot be undone.

Privacy notice