SUPPORTED BY The ChangeOrg
Judgement 3 of 7 How sure we are: Observed

Africa won the argument for Council seats and lost the process

Africa's claim to permanent seats on the Security Council, the UN body that decides on war and peace, won the argument in every speech. The talks that could deliver those seats have run since 2009 without a negotiating text, and they still have no end date. In the one vote that mattered this year, African governments did not act together.

The reasoning

The Secretary-General called Africa's lack of a permanent seat unjust and indefensible. Leaders or ministers from Kenya, Nigeria, Ghana, Ethiopia and Namibia made the same case from the podium. Burundi did so for the . Kenya's President William Ruto said that Africa's 54 nations are "permanently discussed, yet permanently excluded". In July, however, UN members agreed only to continue the reform talks, with no end date and no single text. The African Union has also not said which African countries would hold the seats. Without names or a text, other governments have nothing to vote on.

Burundi, which chairs the African Union this year, nominated Senegal's former President Macky Sall for Secretary-General in March. At least 20 African governments then objected to an African Union endorsement or asked for more time. Senegal's government backed him in July, and President Bassirou Diomaye Faye endorsed him from the podium on 25 September. In the third , an informal vote in the Council, nine members discouraged Sall. Uganda had nominated a second African candidate, Olara Otunnu, in July, which split African support further. The leading candidates now come from Costa Rica and Guyana. Africa's own division made its candidate easier to set aside.

Three of Africa's four largest economies did not send their head of state to speak. Nigeria sent its Vice-President, South Africa its foreign minister and Egypt its Prime Minister. This year, Africa's 54 votes were worth most in the choice of Secretary-General. They have not yet been used as one bloc. Inside the Council, the , the , Liberia and Somalia, each have a vote on the choice, and the Council is still choosing.

The evidence

The strongest argument against

Council reform has stalled for three decades because no region accepts a deadline that would lock in its rivals. By declining to name which countries would hold the seats, the African Union keeps the continent united. A list published now would divide Africa before there is any vote to win.

Sector briefings behind this judgement

Recommended moves

Curious Briefs · Take part

Join the conversation

Your email address is never shown to anyone, and we add you to the newsletter only if you tick the box.

Curious Briefs · Your account

Your account

Your information

Download everything we hold about you

Delete my account

This deletes your account, your comments, reactions and highlights at once. It cannot be undone.

Privacy notice