SUPPORTED BY The ChangeOrg
Recommendation 19 of 20 Continental Act within 100 days · by February 2027 AU summit

Keep asking for permanent seats, and win smaller Security Council gains now

Why this matters

The talks on who sits on the Security Council have run for 17 years without a text to negotiate. In July the continued them with no end date. The United States backs two permanent African seats without the veto, and France also opposes giving the veto to new members. Africa's demand for the veto is where the talks stop.

Eighteen of the 24 binding Council decisions under in 2025 concerned African crises. The member that drafts a decision, called the , shapes what it says. France, the United Kingdom and the United States hold most of these roles, so African members rarely write the texts about Africa.

In March at least 20 AU members blocked AU support for Macky Sall as Secretary-General. They said his bid had bypassed the AU's rules on candidates. Two of the seven candidates in the fourth on 29 September were African, and Africa had agreed a position on neither. Winning smaller gains now would build the discipline that permanent seats would need.

Sources for this section (9)

Four levels of action

  1. What Africa asks of the world

    Move the to a written text. Meanwhile, let African elected members lead the drafting on African crises, and use to pay for missions led by the African Union.

    Who
    The five permanent members, which hold most drafting roles, and the President of the General Assembly, who runs the talks
    When
    The reform talks in the General Assembly session that opened in September 2026
  2. What the African Union does

    , the heads of state who speak for Africa on reform, is coordinated by Sierra Leone. With the it drafts a two-track paper. The paper keeps the demand for permanent seats, lists three demands for now and sets a date to review progress. AU leaders adopt it at their summit.

    Who
    The Committee of Ten, the AU Commission and the AU Assembly
    When
    Draft by 15 December 2026; adoption at the AU summit in February 2027
  3. What regional groups do

    No regional bloc takes part in the reform talks, so the work runs through the AU and the , the caucus of African states in New York. Each regional bloc should make sure its members' bids for Council seats follow the paper. Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger are suspended from AU decisions but still vote in the General Assembly. The African Group should brief them and ask for their support.

    Who
    The African Group in New York and the
    When
    By March 2027
  4. Which country goes first, and why

    The Democratic Republic of the Congo, Liberia and Zimbabwe go first. They are Africa's three Council members in 2027, and they can ask to lead the drafting on African crises at once, with no change to the Charter.

    Who
    The UN missions of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Liberia and Zimbabwe
    When
    By March 2027

Before another country can do this

  • A Council seat, or a firm place in the AU order for one.
  • A mission in New York able to draft and negotiate texts on at least one African crisis.
  • A government that follows the AU rule on candidates for UN posts.
  • AU contributions paid, so that the demand for UN money for AU missions is believable.

What does not carry over from the first country

  • Sierra Leone's standing comes from its role as coordinator of the Committee of Ten.
  • The chance to draft depends on which African crises are on the Council's agenda during a member's term.

Who else is ready

Other countries ready to follow, with reasons and sources
CountryWhySource
Sierra LeoneIt coordinates the Committee of Ten, which in February 2026 called for talks based on a written text.Source (opens in a new tab)
SenegalThe dispute over Macky Sall's bid shows why Africa needs a firm AU rule on candidates.Source (opens in a new tab)
SomaliaThe AU mission there was the first test of Resolution 2719 funding, which the United States blocked.Source (opens in a new tab)

Has this worked before?

In 2015 the General Assembly adopted resolution 69/321, which requires public lists of candidates, their CVs and open question sessions when the Secretary-General is chosen. It needed no change to the Charter. A group of states pressing for better UN working methods, the Non-Aligned Movement led by Algeria, and citizen groups pushed it through. A change in how the UN works can come without waiting for Charter reform. Source (opens in a new tab)

Ethics and International Affairs: how the Secretary-General selection reform was won

First steps

  1. African Unionthe Committee of Ten and the AU Commission send the two-track paper to member states by 15 December 2026. AU leaders adopt it in February 2027.
  2. Regional groupsthe African Group in New York puts the three demands into the reform talks by March 2027, after briefing Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger.
  3. First countriesthe Democratic Republic of the Congo, Liberia and Zimbabwe each ask to lead the drafting on at least one African crisis by March 2027.

Who acts, and with what

Who leads
The Committee of Ten and the AU Commission, carried by the African Group; the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Liberia and Zimbabwe as first users
Instrument
A decision of AU leaders and a paper put into the reform talks at the UN
How progress is checked
At least one of the three demands accepted, and at least one African member leading the drafting on an African crisis in 2027
Signal to change course
Another year of talks with no text and no African member leading any drafting
What stands in the way
Some states fear that smaller gains will weaken the demand for permanent seats. Countries hoping for a seat avoid steps that force a choice between them. Permanent members that hold drafting roles may refuse to share them.
Cost and money
The cost is not yet known. It is mainly the time of diplomats in Addis Ababa and New York. Research institutes would work out the cost of the three demands, including UN funding under Resolution 2719.

Who else contributes

Who else contributes to this recommendation
WhoContribution
The African Group in New YorkCarries the paper into the reform talks
AU Peace and Security CouncilLinks the paper to UN funding under Resolution 2719
AU ministers' committee on candidatesHolds Africa to one position on UN appointments
The Democratic Republic of the Congo, Liberia and ZimbabweTest drafting roles on the Council
Research institutesCost the options

What each audience can do

AU and regional bodies

What you can doAdopt the paper in February

What you gainProgress without dropping the long-term aim

Governments

What you can doBack the paper at home and in New York

What you gainReal influence on decisions about Africa

Researchers and media

What you can doWork out which smaller gains can be won

What you gainA realistic path to reform

NGOs and civil society

What you can doExplain to the public what is at stake

What you gainCitizens who follow UN reform

Young people and citizens

What you can doAsk foreign ministers to report each year on what Africa gained on the Council

What you gainDiplomacy judged by results

The briefings behind this

Curious Briefs · Take part

Join the conversation

Your email address is never shown to anyone, and we add you to the newsletter only if you tick the box.

Curious Briefs · Your account

Your account

Your information

Download everything we hold about you

Delete my account

This deletes your account, your comments, reactions and highlights at once. It cannot be undone.

Privacy notice